On 28.03.2013 15:37, Tomas M wrote:
I would suggest you to maintain only AUFS for the most recent kernel version and officially stop support for old kernels at all. If there is any user who needs AUFS for older kernel then he will have to explain why does he need it, and furthermore he will be politely asked to donate first, to get custom AUFS modifications for his kernel, since he will most likely be a business company which wants AUFS in order to MAKE SOME BUSINESS. Sane business customer may be willing to spend $1000 or more to get AUFS for his insanely old kernel :)
Well, as said with my first post - having at least the most current longtime kernel supported with bugfixes is a must. I do business with the stuff, but I am doing it on a scale of some hundred USD a month by running a small ISP. A minor update costs me about half a day of work, a major kernel upgrade requires updating the whole system (udev, init-tools, etc) and requires about a week till all is build, tested and rolled - so if I need to do a major update every year, just because a bug is not fixed in my kernel, I am forced to remove aufs from my systems.
Oliver -- Protect your environment - close windows and adopt a penguin! PGP-Key: 3B2C 8095 A7DF 8BB5 2CFF 8168 CAB7 B0DD 3985 1721
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
