In my opinion, there are no new features backported to the 'y' versions of any kernel. So from AUFS perspective, the kernel itself is the very same for all 3.2.y versions regardless of 'y', so there is no need for maintaining separate AUFS branches for it, just one for 3.2.*
Ben could probably confirm or clarify that. Tomas M On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:02 AM, <sf...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > Ben Hutchings: >> The base kernel is the 3.2.y stable/longterm branch which I'm >> maintaining at kernel.org. It was updated from 3.2.39 to 3.2.41 today. > > Hmm, so the "y" can grow in the future... > Then I will try creating and releasing aufs3.2.x branch, which will > contain aufs3.2.41 tag. > If I have enough time, I will follow your future update as aufs3.2.42, > 43... > > How long will the debian 3.2 kernel be kept, do you guess? > > > J. R. Okajima > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. > Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire > the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the > Employer Resources Portal > http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
