Hello shraptor, shraptor shraptor: > I tried to read up and it seems they are incompatible? > However that info is a little dated and was wondering > if any new attempts have been made? > > Is it still the "const" problem? > > Are there any success stories?
Here are what I remember now. - Grsec (and pax) patch sets 'const' to all members in the struct for vairous operations, which conflicts aufs's "dynamic operation" feature. - They look strange to me because such const has less meaning, at least it never means putting them into readonly memory section. And I asked grsec people about the purpose. The answer I remember is "it is to make people who change the people think twice." - So I thought twice or thrice and wrote an additional patch to overwrite 'const' members by dirty casting. - I don't remember that I had posted the patch to this ML or sent personally. At last, I think it possible to co-work grsec and aufs, but you will need an extra patch for it. J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
