---------- Forwarded message ----------
   From: toki clover <[1]tokiclo...@gmail.com>
   Date: 2014-12-30 11:11 GMT+01:00
   Subject: Re: Grsecurity and Pax
   To: [2]sf...@users.sourceforge.net
   Thanks Jiro for that inputs.
   I don't remember seeing that patche around in the ML, but I only
   subscribed to it since less than two years ago.
   Second, I have always made a choice, as the OP suggested between
   AUFS or GrSec/PaX because that later patch is monstrously big.
   Third, If ever you found that patch around... do not hesitate to post it
   because it will certainly help a few people interested into both patch set
   AUFS+GrSec/PaX (myself included.)
   I found that "think twice beforehand" ridiculous for a valid reason to
   over complicate things for nothing. Some inputs/feedback need to be
   sent to GrSec folks.
   Thanks.
   --
   Error 404: gentoo user <0123456789> was not found

References

   1. mailto:tokiclo...@gmail.com
   2. mailto:sf...@users.sourceforge.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net

Reply via email to