On 11/02/15 02:54, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> OmegaPhil:
>> I will continue fighting this as a cgmanager bug, but any idea why aufs
>> doesn't know that the reference is still held?
> 
> ??
> Again I don't understand.
> You could not rmmod aufs. It is because your system knows the reference
> to the module is held, right?
> Do you mean that every module should know which process is referencing
> the module itself? If so, it might be better for you to post LKML,
> although I am not sure whether people will be intrested in you.
> 
> 
> J. R. Okajima


The crux of the problem is aufs returned success when unmounting, when
it shouldn't have as not everything had released references to the
volume. That was my question.

I have reported in the following Debian bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767468#58

The answer is probably this from the maintainer:

'cgmanager has made it so it can receive umount events from host ns,
but my guess is / in host ns is still private so it doesn't send
them.  So cgmanager will need to umount everything it doesn't need
at startup, or not create a private mount namespace.'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to