OmegaPhil: > The crux of the problem is aufs returned success when unmounting, when > it shouldn't have as not everything had released references to the > volume. That was my question.
Still I don't understand what you wrote. It would be better if you write a simple script or C program (in system-programming) to reproduce the problem on a generic system other than yours. For example, - you have an entry in /etc/fstab, let's call the fs-type is sillyfs. - your cgmanager is running as usual, and it holds the sillyfs mounted. - you try unmounting the sillyfs in another namespace and FAILED. Assuming this behaviour is what you want, if you replace sillyfs by aufs, you would succeed unmouting in the last step. And you think this aufs behaviour is a problem, right? If so, I'd ask you to represent it in a simple script. And does there such sillyfs exist in real world? What is it? J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
