On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just my 2 cents: I think, that packages without arch=() field should > be also removed.
That seems like a bit much. There's probably a lot of good packages in the AUR without this field and it's not like it's that hard to add it in yourself. > 2008/5/2 Pierre CHAPUIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Le Fri, 02 May 2008 23:53:51 +1000, > > Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > > > > > I suggest we get together in the TU IRC channel on the weekend of 17/18 > > > May and go through the list. I think we should take care not to get too > > > carried away when we remove packages. While some packages may be > > > orphans, if they are not out of date then the PKGBUILD could still be > > > useful for some people. > > > > I suggest you use a public channel instead of the TU channel, so that > other Arch users can participate and why not adopt packages live. Not the > Arch one though, it's too crowded. Maybe you could create a temporary channel > for the event... Agree with this, why not let as many people as possible get involved to get the most done. -- Callan Barrett
