I think you should announce that on a news. A news will be translated for each communities whereas a post in the forum will probably get ignored and non english speaking people won't be advised a cleanup is pending.
Maybe a link should be added to the front page of AUR ? Cilyan 2008/5/2, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > >> But in other way, packages without arch field are usually very, very old. >> >> >> >> > Then they probably fall in this category of the suggest removal guidelines > - outdated and orphaned packages with few or no votes > > > This situation is behind my reasoning to create a list of potential > removals first. I think we need to be careful of removing too many > packages, especially in our first cleanup attempt. Just the really unneeded > ones as a first step. I had even considered that once the list was made, > then I would archive all the relevant PKGBUILDs before deleting them. But it > would be better to just not delete useful packages in the first place... > > Cheers, > Allan > > > > >
