Allan McRae wrote:
Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 22:27, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,

As part of the TU meetings it was decided to post the proposal for
restricting packages entering [community] here for discussion before voting.

My primary issue with the current proposal is that I feel 10 votes is
slightly high for a first step. I'd *much* rather see 3-5 as a
minimum, and I think others would as well.

89/97 packages with 0% usage on package stats have 5 votes or less. So this would achieve a net result of nothing.
Allan





I don't see why 10 votes on /new/ packages is a bad thing, if there's a specific package that a TU wants to add to [community] with less than 10 votes (and not a dependency/i18n/etc) it doesn't seem like it would be too much trouble to post it to the ml and discuss with the rest of us first.

Dan Griffiths

--
Your Fortune...
---------------
He who laughs last didn't get the joke.

Reply via email to