On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Loui Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:54:20PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >> Daenyth Blank wrote: >> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 22:27, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> As part of the TU meetings it was decided to post the proposal for >> >> restricting packages entering [community] here for discussion before >> >> voting. >> >> >> > >> > My primary issue with the current proposal is that I feel 10 votes is >> > slightly high for a first step. I'd *much* rather see 3-5 as a >> > minimum, and I think others would as well. >> > >> >> 89/97 packages with 0% usage on package stats have 5 votes or less. So this >> would achieve a net result of nothing. > > How does that achieve a net result of nothing? > If these rules were already in place it could have meant a net result > of more than 500 less packages in community that we need to deal with.
He's saying that lowering the voting requirements to 5 votes will give us nothing because there are a lot of crap/unused packages with 5 votes.
