On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 04:53:32PM +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Daenyth Blank <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 00:59, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Any other people want to comment on this? Any TUs feel keeping AUR pages > >> for [community] packages is necessary? > >> > >> Allan > >> > > > > I'd like to keep them. Especially if we get smooth non-destructive > > transitions moving a package from community to unsupported. > > > > So -1, keep the comments IMO. > > Please remove the comments. I'd rather have everything in one place > (bug tracker). People seem to abuse the comment section too much > anyway by filing bugs there, it is really anoying so remove :D
It seems the consensus is to remove community packages from the AUR interface altogether. Before we do that though we should do a general package clean up. Moving packages with extremely low votes/pkgstats usage into unsupported, so we're not importing garbage into the new system. What do you think?
