Re: [aur-general] Community and the AUR (Was: Vote - Moving [community] to use same system as main repos)

[Loui Chang]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:14:45PM -0500, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:19:21AM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 00:59, Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > > Any other people want to comment on this?  Any TUs feel keeping AUR pages
> > > for [community] packages is necessary?
> > >
> > > Allan
> > >
> > 
> > I'd like to keep them. Especially if we get smooth non-destructive
> > transitions moving a package from community to unsupported.
> 
> Hmm it seems like all it takes to move a package from community to
> unsupported is to upload the tarball with buildscripts via the AUR
> interface (pkgsubmit.php). Votes and comments are preserved.
> 
> So if we're doing a clean up, we can disable tupkgupdate to be safe.
> tupkgupdate only runs a minute after the hour every hour.
> It shouldn't be a problem really.
  
Err you have to upload it to AUR, then untag and delete it from CVS.
If you don't delete it, it will actually stay in the community repo, but
won't show up in the AUR interface.