On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 19:53, Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: > Angel Velásquez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Andrei Thorp <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Decent quality packages in Community please. >> > >> > - Just one member of the Arch user base >> > >> >> Excuse me? I hope that I missunderstood what you said, but in case you >> are complaining about the quality of packages in community, I just can >> say "talk is easier than do anything" (poor translation about an known >> advice in my language). >> >> Thanks. >> -- >> Angel Velásquez > > I don't think he meant it that way. I think he was replying to Ali's > statement that implied that the quality of packages in community was not as > important as the quality of packages in core/extra. I think he means that the > quality of community packages is good and that it should stay that way. > > I could be wrong. > >
This is how I read it also
