On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:02:41 -0400 Loui Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:45:43PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:34:03 -0400 > > Loui Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:55:52PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > > > > So this is a bug in yaourt, the second today it seems. > > > > Guess I start hunting for the yaourt and namcap bugtrackers.. > > > > > > When tracking down bugs please do not pollute your results by > > > relying on unsupported scripts. > > > > The problem is that even if those scripts are unsupported they are > > widely used (well, namcap not as widely a one could wish). > > It should be clear if you saw the disclaimer on the AUR home page. > I guess that could be a case to put the disclaimer on every page, so > the point is hammered in. Heh. Won't help ;) > Namcap is a supported script by the way. I figured in the meantime :) > > Does one know how to report bugs for namcap? > > Arch Linux bug tracker: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=1&do=index&switch=1 Already reported: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14124?opened=4326 Does the AUR webpage and yaourt rely on namcap as well? Both don't get it right either. '+' bug for yaourt reported here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14122?opened=4326 Best regards, Philipp
