On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 04:21:53PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:02:41 -0400 > Loui Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:45:43PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:34:03 -0400 > > > Loui Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:55:52PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > So this is a bug in yaourt, the second today it seems. > > > > > Guess I start hunting for the yaourt and namcap bugtrackers.. > > > > > > > > When tracking down bugs please do not pollute your results by > > > > relying on unsupported scripts. > > > > > > The problem is that even if those scripts are unsupported they are > > > widely used (well, namcap not as widely a one could wish). > > > > It should be clear if you saw the disclaimer on the AUR home page. > > I guess that could be a case to put the disclaimer on every page, so > > the point is hammered in. Heh. > > Won't help ;)
What do you suggest? I could delete and/or block yaourt from AUR if there are too many support requests to Arch. > Does the AUR webpage and yaourt rely on namcap as well? Both don't get > it right either. AUR doesn't rely on namcap. > '+' bug for yaourt reported here: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14122?opened=4326 Jeez don't file bugs for unsupported scripts. Contact the yaourt developers. If you can't get a hold of them then there's nothing that the Arch Linux devs can do for you.
