> Actually, it is distributed under the GPL, so that is techniqually fine... Yes, but that is why I mentioned "author's intentions".
- [aur-general] When does a package need -svn? hollunder
- Re: [aur-general] When does a package need -svn? Ray Rashif
- Re: [aur-general] When does a package need -svn? Allan McRae
- Re: [aur-general] When does a package need -svn? Ray Rashif
- Re: [aur-general] When does a package need -... Allan McRae
- Re: [aur-general] When does a package n... Andrei Thorp
- Re: [aur-general] When does a package n... Ray Rashif
- Re: [aur-general] When does a packa... Xyne
- Re: [aur-general] When does a p... Ray Rashif
- Re: [aur-general] When does a p... hollunder
- Re: [aur-general] When does a p... Andrei Thorp
- Re: [aur-general] When does a p... Xyne
- Re: [aur-general] When does a p... Andrei Thorp
- Re: [aur-general] When does a p... Xavier
