Legal licence holds some more weight over their strange habits, I think. -AT
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > Ray Rashif wrote: >>> >>> Actually, it is distributed under the GPL, so that is techniqually >>> fine... >>> >> >> Yes, but that is why I mentioned "author's intentions". >> > > But the author also intends you to provide the source when you distribute > binaries. That is why they used the GPL license. So I would pick that > intention over the contradictory one... > > Allan > > > > >
