On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > >> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > > > This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. > > Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be > creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, > if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that > part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start > writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if > it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?).
I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished later. -- Florian Friesdorf <[email protected]> GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: [email protected] OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
pgpebWW7jrkVT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
