The main reason why a asked for it is amount of crap in AUR. I have my own repo, maybe that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. Sorry for my bad english =(
On 03/02/10 12:31, Angel Velásquez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > >> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > > > This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. > > Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be > creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, > if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that > part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start > writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if > it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). > > Let's see what happens! > > > > -- > Angel Velásquez > angvp @ irc.freenode.net > Arch Linux Trusted User > Linux Counter: #359909 > http://www.angvp.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
