On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 21:18:25 -0400 Stephen Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > The aur has far too many versions of go (http://golang.org). Many of > them are out of date. I went though and tried to find as many as I > could. I believe most of these should be deleted. > > go-google-mercurial http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31969 > I think this one should be deleted. go is in community and this does > not have provides/conflicts with that package.
Deleted. > golang http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31912 > Very old. I am not even sure if it works. It is also missing > provides/conflicts. Deleted. > go-hg http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33695 > Much better! Missing provides but has conflicts. PKGBUILD looks sound. > > go-lang-hg > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31913 > This one is the best. It does not have any problems. It looks like it > is mostly a copy of the one from abs except it fetches the tip instead > of release. It also has provides/conflicts. > > go-lang-hg has only one flaw, the name. I think it should be named > go-hg since it is the hg of a package in community. > > If I am wrong on any of this, let me know. I am new to packaging and I > have only made three of them. I am still learning :-). > > -- Stephen Now for go-hg and go-lang-hg: Christian ask the Maintainer if he will hand the package over to you, or at least improve it accordingly. I'll delete your package in a few days. -- Jabber: [email protected] Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
