On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Thorsten Töpper <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:25:38 +0200 > Christian Himpel <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Stefan Husmann >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Am 08.06.2010 01:57, schrieb Andres P: >> >>> >> >>> Now for go-hg and go-lang-hg: Christian ask the Maintainer if he >> >>> will hand the package over to you, or at least improve it >> >>> accordingly. I'll delete your package in a few days. >> >> >> >> I was the maintainer of go-hg. >> >> >> >> This one was the basis for the package in community; I helped out >> >> Vegai some time ago. >> >> >> >> Anyway, I don't have access to that account anymore, nor the email >> >> that's associated with it. And I'm also not interested in >> >> maintaining it anymore. >> >> >> >> Feel free to disown all packages associated to account res, >> >> Andres P >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Done, thank you. >> >> i adopted go-hg[1], flagged go-lang-hg[2] out of date and wrote a >> comment, that go-lang-hg was replaced by go-hg. >> so i think go-lang-hg[2] can be deleted now (it's too bad about the >> votes of [2]...). >> >> i hope that's okay now. >> >> cheers, >> chressie >> >> [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33695 >> [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31913 > > Deleted go-lang-hg, people should have read the comment by now.
great, thanks! cheers, chressie
