On Thursday 26 August 2010 08:12:23 Ronald van Haren wrote: > My second point was that we don't know what the future will bring. > Will new applications being licensed under GPL2 or later, GPL3 or > later, GPL4, GPL4 or later... there are lots of options. There are > lots of possibilities and I'm wondering if it is at all feasible to > create a naming scheme which will fit all.
Sure: GPL2 GPL2+ GPL3 GPL3+ etc. For convenience, you may want to make GPL the equivalent of GPL2+
