On Thursday 26 August 2010 08:25:06 Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Excerpts from Roberto Alsina's message of 2010-08-26 13:16:05 +0200: > > On Thursday 26 August 2010 08:12:23 Ronald van Haren wrote: > > > My second point was that we don't know what the future will bring. > > > Will new applications being licensed under GPL2 or later, GPL3 or > > > later, GPL4, GPL4 or later... there are lots of options. There are > > > lots of possibilities and I'm wondering if it is at all feasible to > > > create a naming scheme which will fit all. > > > > > > > > Sure: > > > > > > GPL2 > > GPL2+ > > GPL3 > > GPL3+ > > etc. > > That's what I'd be in favor of. I'm not sure the '+' is the best way, > because it has other meanings than 'any later' as well.
I have not heard of something called GPL2+ before. What is it? > > For convenience, you may want to make GPL the equivalent of GPL2+ > > I think that's not convenient but confusing. Or you may not, of course ;-)
