Nathan O wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Nathan O > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Should libicq2000 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11337 be >> deleted, the package gives that it can't find libsigc++ though it is >> installed. I did some research and it is said that libicq2000 will not >> work with the libsigc++-2. I am thinking that you are not able to install >> libsigc++ and libsigc++-2. If it is to be deleted, package ickle >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11336 should be deleted because >> it depends on libicq2000. Not sure what to do in this aspect. >> >> Thanks >> > Or the better question may be, can libsigc++-2 and libsigc++ be "friendly" > together? I am betting no, but if it can then it wouldn't need to be > deleted(the above mention packages)
You should be able to have both without problem, that's why they have different names (just like gtk 1/2/3). -- Rémy.
