On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Rémy Oudompheng <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nathan O wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Nathan O > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Should libicq2000 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11337 be > >> deleted, the package gives that it can't find libsigc++ though it is > >> installed. I did some research and it is said that libicq2000 will not > >> work with the libsigc++-2. I am thinking that you are not able to > install > >> libsigc++ and libsigc++-2. If it is to be deleted, package ickle > >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11336 should be deleted > because > >> it depends on libicq2000. Not sure what to do in this aspect. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > > Or the better question may be, can libsigc++-2 and libsigc++ be > "friendly" > > together? I am betting no, but if it can then it wouldn't need to be > > deleted(the above mention packages) > > You should be able to have both without problem, that's why they have > different names (just like gtk 1/2/3). > > -- > Rémy. > > Ok just wanted to make sure. I think libsigcplusplus http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11338 should be deleted, it seems that http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11336 is the same
