On 09/12/2010 07:03 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:00 PM, elwin013 <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi. :)
>> Please remove tint [1] package from AUR because it's not up-to-date and same
>> package is in Community repo [2]
>>
>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17082
>> [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/tint2/
>>
>> --
>> elwin013
>> jabber: [email protected]
>> mail: [email protected]
>
> Done, thanks.
>
IMHO tint should have stayed. TINT was as up to date as it got, any
release after that was tint2 (which is what is in repo).
>From convo on IRC there are/(were) ppl that still prefered to use tint
over tint2.
No idea why, but they did.
Just sayin'