On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:30 PM, elwin013 <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12.09.2010 15:15, jwbirdsong wrote: >> >> IMHO tint should have stayed. TINT was as up to date as it got, any >> release after that was tint2 (which is what is in repo). >>> >>> From convo on IRC there are/(were) ppl that still prefered to use tint >> >> over tint2. >> No idea why, but they did. >> Just sayin' > > Ups, you're right. So I can reupload it (I have downloaded PKGBUILD) or some > TU can do undo? > I apologize for problems :( > > -- > elwin013
Don't worry about it. It was me that should have checked better, but somehow I missed it was tint2 and not tint in [community]. tint has been reuploaded to the AUR and the wiki page that linked to it now points to the reuploaded package.
