Am 14.10.2010 08:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: > I just noticed that libreoffice-new has been uploaded. Contrary to the > last post in https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=105664 the old > libreoffice in the AUR has not yet (to my searching) been deleted (I > think its been reuploaded). Obviously, its exactly the same. > > I wonder what the point is of having libreoffice-new though. It's > basically just extracting of some rpms, as compared to the libreoffice > from [testing]. > > I propose that libreoffice[1] and libreoffice-new[2] be deleted. The > author should reupload as libreoffice-bin. If a TU agrees, I volunteer > to email the author. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41792 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41793 > > Hello,
I deleted libreoffice again because of the name clash. But in the past we allowed binary versions or beta versions of some projects, so why not doing here? I would not recommend its usage, but let people decide. Regards Stefan
