Am 14.10.2010 09:51, schrieb Vitaliy Berdinskikh UR6LAD: > Hi all! > >> Am 14.10.2010 09:27, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: >>> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 09:14 +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote: >>>> Am 14.10.2010 08:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: >>>>> I just noticed that libreoffice-new has been uploaded. Contrary to the > ... >>>>> I propose that libreoffice[1] and libreoffice-new[2] be deleted. The >>>>> author should reupload as libreoffice-bin. If a TU agrees, I volunteer >>>>> to email the author. > ... >>>>> > ... >>>> I would not recommend its usage, but let people decide. > ... >>> >>> I was just thinking the name is misleading, and -bin is a better name. > ... >> Yes this is a discussable point. > > Can I upload libreoffice (3.3.0-beta not 3.2.99) to AUR? > Who can explain? > > -- > Less QRM more DX > Vitaliy Berdinskikh > > -- реклама ----------------------------------------------------------- > Три новые линейки хостинг-планов - всё что нужно Вашему сайту! > 6 месяцев хостинга бесплатно и домен в подарок. http://Hvosting.ua > >
Hello, not under that name. If you do not compile from sources, use libreoffice-bin. -beta was my first choice, but -bin is imho better. Regards Stefan
