On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:06:25AM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > Ranguvar has been added in our team no more than last year. > > Conform bylaws a motion should be sent and two active TUs and a > voting procedure should follow after 7 days of discussion. > > Here are my reasons: > > 1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel > panel, i asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied > that he doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable > for community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and > adopt some packages from community. At that time we have ~700 > orphans and i haven't got any replies from him. > > 2) no commits in community since the addition. > > 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this proposal > doesn't have sense. Quoting: > > "There is one special case for removal, removal due to unwarranted > and undeclared inactivity, for which standard voting procedure > deviates from the above." > > I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them.
This is kinda sad to hear, but given the complete (and undeclared) inactivity, I'd agree.
