On 3 December 2010 06:47, Lukas Fleischer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:06:25AM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >> Ranguvar has been added in our team no more than last year. >> >> Conform bylaws a motion should be sent and two active TUs and a >> voting procedure should follow after 7 days of discussion. >> >> Here are my reasons: >> >> 1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel >> panel, i asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied >> that he doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable >> for community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and >> adopt some packages from community. At that time we have ~700 >> orphans and i haven't got any replies from him. >> >> 2) no commits in community since the addition. >> >> 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this proposal >> doesn't have sense. Quoting: >> >> "There is one special case for removal, removal due to unwarranted >> and undeclared inactivity, for which standard voting procedure >> deviates from the above." >> >> I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them. > > This is kinda sad to hear, but given the complete (and undeclared) > inactivity, I'd agree.
Yeah. At first I thought it was a normal inactivity issue. But then Ionut made me aware that he doesn't even have an account. That was awkward. Anyway, he doesn't appear to have the time. So I say it's best he's removed for now. He can apply again after 3 months if by that time he wants to start contributing.
