On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Shacristo <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kaiting Chen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I move for the amendment of the bylaws. The patch against the current > > document is attached. Basically the amendment proposes that once an > absolute > > majority is reached the voting period is to end immediately regardless of > > whether or not quorum was reached. The purpose of this amendment is to > > minimize parliamentary inefficiency by allowing votes with clearly > decided > > outcomes to be resolved before the end of the established voting period. > > --Kaiting. > > One of the stated purposes of the quorum is to "ensure that TUs remain > active in the job that they have taken on." Allowing circumvention of > the quorum requirements will obviously undermine that. > TU's have a lot of different responsibilities. Prolonging a decided vote by six days to motivate or ensure that someone is active does not make sense to me. --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
