On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 12:53:56 -0500 Kaiting Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Thorsten Töpper > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > I agree though I'd say 5 days has to be a minimum, everyone has a > > couple of days when something needs to be finished and where except > > for getting a few runs at the build server not much of the TU stuff > > can be done, same goes for some days sick in bed. > > > > For falconindy's application the vote was decided in less than > thirteen hours. --Kaiting. >
And? Allan already brought up why this proposal is weak. Also not every- one around the world is up 24h, consider different timezones. Also the status of a vote has not to be known public till it's over so get your- self together. Shortening the voting period a bit: fine, cutting it as soon as there is something(Yes/No) does not make any sense, read the current bylaws read how inactivity is determined and then rethink about your proposal. -- Jabber: [email protected] Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
