On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 17:42 +0100, Cédric Girard wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Stefan Husmann > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Am 24.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Cédric Girard: > > > utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, > > is > > > outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 > > > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 > > > > > > > Done, thank you. > > > > A new utorrent-server [1] has been uploaded 2 weeks later. It is a duplicate > of utserver [2]. > They have a similar PKGBUILD, except that [1] handles both arch and has, I > think, a better naming. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 >
I have checked the packages and utorrent-server is better packaged then the second since it has a better name and support for both arches. Can't we just notify packager [1] to use package [2] and remove [1] :P -- Jelle van der Waa
