Am 06.01.2011 18:29, schrieb Jelle van der Waa: > On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 17:42 +0100, Cédric Girard wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Stefan Husmann >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Am 24.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Cédric Girard: >>>> utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, >>> is >>>> outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 >>>> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 >>>> >>> >>> Done, thank you. >>> >> >> A new utorrent-server [1] has been uploaded 2 weeks later. It is a duplicate >> of utserver [2]. >> They have a similar PKGBUILD, except that [1] handles both arch and has, I >> think, a better naming. >> >> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253 >> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 >> > > I have checked the packages and utorrent-server is better packaged then > the second since it has a better name and support for both arches. > > Can't we just notify packager [1] to use package [2] and remove [1] :P
Hello, the packager was emailed by me and did not answer yet. So I'd say yes for removel. Regards Stefan
