On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Seblu <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Peter Lewis <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Sunday 23 January 2011 16:15:41 Peter Lewis wrote: > >>> On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:07:28 Peter Lewis wrote: > >>> > On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:37:13 Seblu wrote: > >>> > > Tonight I decided to propose me as TU. My sponsor is Peter Lewis. > >>> > > >>> > I am indeed. Let the discussion period begin! > >>> > >>> The discussion period has now ended and voting can begin. Please pop > >> along > >>> to the AUR to do so: > >>> > >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=47 > >> > >> Voting is now closed and the results are in: > >> > >> Yes - 7 > >> No - 11 > >> Abstain - 5 > >> > >> Quoracy was reached (74%) with a total of 23 / 31 active+voting TUs > >> casting their votes. > >> > >> Sorry Sébastien, on this occasion I'm afraid you were unsuccessful. > >> > >> According to the bylaws, you're welcome to apply again after a minimum > >> period of three months. > >> > >> I wonder if it might be useful at this stage for some of the TUs to give > >> Sébastien some advice on improving his application in case he decides to > >> reapply in the future. > >> > > Thanks for your support Peter and thoses we vote for me. > > > > > > Hey Seblu, I would just like to thank you for your application, even > if it didn't go the way you had hoped for. > It seems like your intentions are good, but you somewhat lacking in > experience. > That said, I would welcome you to apply again once you started getting > more involved with the community. > One suggestion is to become really good with packages and maintain a > lot more of them, but other skills would also be nice, fix bugs etc. > > Cheers! > I just saw this Sebula, I hope that you consider re-applying once you have a few more packages under your belt, you are very close to becoming a TU and we would love to have you! -Thomas S Hatch
