The projects names are same to the aur pkg's names, it's better to mention the diffrents in PKGBUILD's pkgdesc, not to change the aur names!
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) <[email protected]> > 2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) <[email protected]>: > > In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and > [svn2git-git][2]. > > > > At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the > > first,then it turns out that they are to different packages. > > > > The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. > > Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git > > > > The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on > > http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: > > http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git > > > > I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one > > of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby > > gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git > > or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name. > > > > I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion. > > Sorry, forgot the link. > > [1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55337 > [2]:http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37209 >
