在 2012年2月19日 上午5:56，Alireza Savand <[email protected]> 写道： > The projects names are same to the aur pkg's names, it's better > to mention the diffrents in PKGBUILD's pkgdesc, not to change the aur names! > > 2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) <[email protected]> > >> 2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) <[email protected]>: >> > In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and >> [svn2git-git][2]. >> > >> > At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the >> > first,then it turns out that they are to different packages. >> > >> > The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. >> > Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git >> > >> > The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on >> > http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: >> > http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git >> > >> > I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one >> > of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby >> > gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git >> > or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name. >> > >> > I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion. >> >> Sorry, forgot the link. >> >> [1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55337 >> [2]:http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37209 >>
There may be a confuse. https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git can be package as svn2git and svn2git-git, http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git also can be package as svn2git and svn2git-git.There will be conflict. As I mentioned, https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git is a ruby gem package, according to [Arch Ruby Gem Package Guildlines](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ruby_Gem_Package_Guidelines), the name can be set to ruby-svn2git and ruby-svn2git-git, this way, there will be no confusion and conflict. One can have them both installed on a same machine.
