On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Ike Devolder <[email protected]> wrote: > Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:46:08 schreef D. Can Celasun: >> Wow, Déjà vu! In the past another TU asked me the exact same question >> and it was decided that if the maintainer didn't update any of his >> packages for a long time (e.g a year) the wait-2-weeks-for-response >> wasn't necessary. That particular discussion is here [1]. So I'd be >> glad if you could go ahead and orphan the packages. >> >> Thanks! >> >> [1] >> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-October/016307.html >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Ike Devolder <[email protected]> > wrote: >> > Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:36:16 schreef D. Can Celasun: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Can someone please orphan rabbitvcs-thunar [1] and thunarx-python[2] ? >> >> The maintainer hasn't updated any of his packages in over a year and >> >> there are updated PKGBUILDs in the comments. I'd like to maintain >> >> them. >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34590 >> >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34589 >> > >> > Did you email the current maintainer ? >> > If he/she does not respond in two weeks we can orphan [1]. >> > >> > [1] >> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Q:_Foo_in_AUR_is_outdated.3B_what >> > _do_I_do.3F >> > >> > thx >> > >> > --Ike > > This thing about the long not updated packages was never written down, so that > is why you get this question again. > now i have updated the wiki so this is known for more than you alone. i cant > remember everything that ever happened in the mailinglist. > > so maybe you could also notify in the mail that we are talking about long > marked packages this makes it easier for us to make a decision. > > and at last, orphaned both. thx > > --Ike
Thanks for orphaning. Also, I'm sorry if my response seemed, well, aggressive. That was certainly not my intention. Cheers, Can
