Op zondag 15 juli 2012 22:31:33 schreef D. Can Celasun: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Ike Devolder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:46:08 schreef D. Can Celasun: > >> Wow, Déjà vu! In the past another TU asked me the exact same question > >> and it was decided that if the maintainer didn't update any of his > >> packages for a long time (e.g a year) the wait-2-weeks-for-response > >> wasn't necessary. That particular discussion is here [1]. So I'd be > >> glad if you could go ahead and orphan the packages. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> [1] > >> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-October/016307.ht > >> ml > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Ike Devolder <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > >> > Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:36:16 schreef D. Can Celasun: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> Can someone please orphan rabbitvcs-thunar [1] and thunarx-python[2] ? > >> >> The maintainer hasn't updated any of his packages in over a year and > >> >> there are updated PKGBUILDs in the comments. I'd like to maintain > >> >> them. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks. > >> >> > >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID4590 > >> >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID4589 > >> > > >> > Did you email the current maintainer ? > >> > If he/she does not respond in two weeks we can orphan [1]. > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Q:_Foo_in_AUR_is_outdated.3B_w > >> > hat > >> > _do_I_do.3F > >> > > >> > thx > >> > > >> > --Ike > > > > This thing about the long not updated packages was never written down, so > > that is why you get this question again. > > now i have updated the wiki so this is known for more than you alone. i > > cant remember everything that ever happened in the mailinglist. > > > > so maybe you could also notify in the mail that we are talking about long > > marked packages this makes it easier for us to make a decision. > > > > and at last, orphaned both. thx > > > > --Ike > > Thanks for orphaning. > > Also, I'm sorry if my response seemed, well, aggressive. That was > certainly not my intention. > > Cheers, > Can
i can understand if you got this question before and went through a discussion before you don't want to get this question again. no hard feelings :) --Ike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
