On 01/13/2013 03:52 PM, Xyne wrote: > Kwpolska wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >>> >>>> It doesn't support them directly, but many packagers use Felix' >>>> workaround. If you are going to spam AUR like Jorge did, I'll be in >>>> really wild mood, trust me. >>> >>> What did he do that you consider spamming? >> >> 88 packages are quite a lot. (src: OP’s original split PKGBUILD) > > When did contributing to the AUR become "spamming"? The packages are for > separate languages and directly correspond to upstream. I do not consider that > spam at all. If anything, it is a commendable effort to provide those packages > despite the AURs inability to (fully) support split packages. > > If TUs now threaten users who contribute too much then I think something has > gone very wrong. >
I wonder if he also consider the libreoffice packages in the repos to be spam. -- Kindest Regards, Johannes "Kyrias" Löthberg Key ID: D84845F1 595C 8E08 DAE1 4A56 492C F750 BE76 C444 D848 45F1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
