On 01/13/2013 04:00 PM, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > On 01/13/2013 03:52 PM, Xyne wrote: >> Kwpolska wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >>>> >>>>> It doesn't support them directly, but many packagers use Felix' >>>>> workaround. If you are going to spam AUR like Jorge did, I'll be in >>>>> really wild mood, trust me. >>>> >>>> What did he do that you consider spamming? >>> >>> 88 packages are quite a lot. (src: OP’s original split PKGBUILD) >> >> When did contributing to the AUR become "spamming"? The packages are for >> separate languages and directly correspond to upstream. I do not consider >> that >> spam at all. If anything, it is a commendable effort to provide those >> packages >> despite the AURs inability to (fully) support split packages. >> >> If TUs now threaten users who contribute too much then I think something has >> gone very wrong. >> > > I wonder if he also consider the libreoffice packages in the repos to be > spam. >
I wonder if you have something constructive to say. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
