Sorry, I forgot to mention that I did send an email. I'm not interested in mantaining haste/haskell-haste, should it be deleted then? I only requested the rename because I saw it was no correctly named when I was maintainingg ruby-haste.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013, at 12:24 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 23:08 -0800, Neer Sighted wrote: > > 1. Would a TU please rename 'haste' to 'haskell-haste'? > > 2. Would a TU please orphan 'ruby-build'? > > > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haste/ > > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-build/ > > > > 1. You need to upload a haskell-haste PKGBUILD so we can merge haste > into it. > 2. The rules are to send an email to the maintainer. Only after 2 weeks > without an answer can we disown a package. > > -- > Maxime > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) -- Neer Sighted, Hacker http://neersighted.com | [email protected] {01DC2056}
