On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 00:49 -0800, Neer Sighted wrote: > Sorry, I forgot to mention that I did send an email. I'm not interested > in mantaining haste/haskell-haste, should it be deleted then? I only > requested the rename because I saw it was no correctly named when I was > maintainingg ruby-haste. > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013, at 12:24 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 23:08 -0800, Neer Sighted wrote: > > > 1. Would a TU please rename 'haste' to 'haskell-haste'? > > > 2. Would a TU please orphan 'ruby-build'? > > > > > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haste/ > > > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-build/ > > > > > > > 1. You need to upload a haskell-haste PKGBUILD so we can merge haste > > into it. > > 2. The rules are to send an email to the maintainer. Only after 2 weeks > > without an answer can we disown a package. > > > > -- > > Maxime > > Email had 1 attachment: > > + signature.asc > > 1k (application/pgp-signature) > >
Deleted haste, one of the deps didn't exist. Also disowned ruby-build. Thx -- Maxime
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
