On ven, 2013-04-05 at 20:05 +0000, Xyne wrote: > Nuno Araujo wrote: > > >Could you please disown pyusb [1]. > > > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyusb/ > > > > done
Is there a race taking place to see who takes ownership of the recently disowned packages or to see who has the most packages maintained in AUR? Less than one hour after the package was disowned, ownership was taken by user luolimao. This user has over 200 packages on AUR! However the fix that I need to see applied to the package was still not applied. I don't care who maintains the package (less work for me if it's someone else), but when someone takes ownership of a given package that needs some work I expect that he has already prepared what needs to be done locally. Could we change the behavior of the disown requests to give ownership to the user who makes the request? Regards -- Nuno Araujo <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
