On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 23:22 +0200, Nuno Araujo wrote: > On ven, 2013-04-05 at 20:05 +0000, Xyne wrote: > > Nuno Araujo wrote: > > > > >Could you please disown pyusb [1]. > > > > > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyusb/ > > > > > > > done > > Is there a race taking place to see who takes ownership of the recently > disowned packages or to see who has the most packages maintained in AUR? > Less than one hour after the package was disowned, ownership was taken > by user luolimao. This user has over 200 packages on AUR! > However the fix that I need to see applied to the package was still not > applied. > > I don't care who maintains the package (less work for me if it's someone > else), but when someone takes ownership of a given package that needs > some work I expect that he has already prepared what needs to be done > locally. > > Could we change the behavior of the disown requests to give ownership to > the user who makes the request? > > Regards
I've disowned it again, please feel free to adopt it. Cheers. -- Maxime
