Angel Velásquez wrote: >Supa easy, open the TU panel at the AUR, check who voted and who didn't >on the lasts SVP (the last three or more if you want) .. make some >decision about it, yeah we made the quorum but still, what about these >people that is marked as active, do packaging stuff but are working >isolated of the team? (seems to don't care about who we add or who we >remove). > >After "stirring the pot" as somebody said to me, I consider that doing >patches for the AUR is good, in order to make everybody aware and have >no excuses for everyone. > >Let's see what's happens on the next SVP ;). >
After my previous reply I spent a little time thinking about the current bylaws and our notions of activity. I have posted a message to the list with a modified version of the bylaws to begin a discussion (i.e. the version I have sent is not a final proposal). The message is awaiting moderation because the attachments went over 40k (52k I think). I expect that to lead to some interesting discussion so I'll follow up on that thread.
