On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: > Angel Velásquez wrote: > >>Supa easy, open the TU panel at the AUR, check who voted and who didn't >>on the lasts SVP (the last three or more if you want) .. make some >>decision about it, yeah we made the quorum but still, what about these >>people that is marked as active, do packaging stuff but are working >>isolated of the team? (seems to don't care about who we add or who we >>remove). >> >>After "stirring the pot" as somebody said to me, I consider that doing >>patches for the AUR is good, in order to make everybody aware and have >>no excuses for everyone. >> >>Let's see what's happens on the next SVP ;). >> > > After my previous reply I spent a little time thinking about the current > bylaws > and our notions of activity. I have posted a message to the list with a > modified version of the bylaws to begin a discussion (i.e. the version I have > sent is not a final proposal). There is currently a discussion around amending the by-laws started by Lukas. Maybe you could join us instead of restarting a thread?
Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A
