On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Felix Yan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no >> >> dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to >> >> the TUs. >> >> >> >> Please do one of the following: >> >> --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git >> >> --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and delete >> >> vim-colors-solarized-git >> >> >> >> >> >> I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages. >> >> >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/ >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/ >> >> >> >> Thanks >> > >> > This still needs to be acted upon. >> >> Can a TU delete vim-solarized-git please? >> >> Jason > > We still need to wait for xales's response, as this is his package and will > still be maintained by him even after the merge. > > Regards, > Felix Yan
xales is the new maintainer of both packages, and instead of updating vim-solarized-git, he created a new package (vim-colors-solarized-git). I think it's pretty clear which package xales prefers. Jason
