Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason St. John <jstj...@purdue.edu> 
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Felix Yan <felixonm...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
 On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John 
<jstj...@purdue.edu> wrote:
 > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John 
<jstj...@purdue.edu> wrote:
 >> Hello,
 >>
 >> I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to 
be no
 >> dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision 
up to
 >> the TUs.
 >>
 >> Please do one of the following:
 >> --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git
 >> --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and 
delete
 >> vim-colors-solarized-git
 >>
 >>
 >> I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages.
 >>
 >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/
 >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/
 >>
 >> Thanks
 >
 > This still needs to be acted upon.

 Can a TU delete vim-solarized-git please?

 Jason

 We still need to wait for xales's response, as this is his package 
and will still be maintained by him even after the merge.

 Regards,
 Felix Yan

xales is the new maintainer of both packages, and instead of updating
vim-solarized-git, he created a new package
(vim-colors-solarized-git). I think it's pretty clear which package
xales prefers.

Jason


Merged, thx.
--
Maxime